Scientific
Classification of Wolves
Gray Wolves
Red Wolves
Ethiopian
Wolves
Wolf Prey and
Predation
Yellowstone After Wolves
Depredation
(9 items)
Are
Wolves Endangered
IUCN
Manifesto on Wolf Conservation
Federal
Process of Reclassification and the Endangered Species Act
(4 items)
Frequently
Asked Questions About Wolf Management
Methods
Used for Estimating Wolf Abundance
Human Perspectives
 |
 |


Updated August 2005
The gray wolf in the contiguous 48 United States has long been on the
federal government's list of endangered species, which includes
both threatened and endangered populations. In the Eastern and Western
distinct population segments (DPS), the gray wolf is considered by the
federal government to be threatened, whereas it is considered fully endangered
the Southwestern DPS. In Alaska the gray wolf thrives in such numbers that
it is neither threatened nor endangered.
Classifying the status of animals is a judgment call. In some cases,
the judgment is easy. For example, the California condor population
includes only a few remaining members and is clearly endangered.
With other species, such as the gray wolf, the situation is far more
complex.
Worldwide, wolves once lived everywhere north of about 20 degrees
north latitude, a parallel that runs through Mexico City and southern
India. In 1999 the minimum world wolf population was estimated at
150,000, with a minimum of 55,000 in Canada, 85,181 in Eurasia,
and 9,790 in the United States (including Alaska). Mexico may have
no remaining wolves. In many other countries, the gray wolf is long gone.
In the 48 contiguous states, wolf populations are scattered. Minnesota supports
about 3,020 wolves. This population seems to be increasing in numbers and in
distribution. About 425 wolves live in Wisconsin and around 360 in the Upper
Peninsula of Michigan. Isle Royale holds 30. Northwest Montana supports over
92 wolves. With the government-sponsored reintroduction of wolves into
Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming and also into Central Idaho 1995 and 1996,
the Greater Yellowstone Area now supports over 301 wolves, and Central Idaho
supports over 368. In addition Mexican wolves were reintroduced into Arizona and
New Mexico in 1998 and the wild population is steady at around 50.
How should the gray wolf be classified in the 48 states?
People who contend that the currently-used endangered classification
is correct, cite the following reasons:
- In the contiguous 48 states, the gray wolf currently occupies only
about 6 percent of its former range.
- Most of the grau wolf's former habitat in these 48 states is unsuitable
for wolves, and probably never will be suitable, due mainly to
human encroachment.
- Public attitudes toward wolves are mixed, with many residents
of the gray wolf's range holding strong anti-wolf opinions.
- The long-term trends in land use suggest that much of the current
or potential wolf range will continue to be developed and, thus,
rendered unsuitable for wolves, even in Minnesota.
- It was only after gray wolves were given protection by the Endangered
Species Act that wolf populations in the United States began to
increase.
Opponents of the endangered species classification
for the gray wolf in the contiguous 48 states counter with these arguments:
- Approximately 3,020 gray wolves live in Minnesota, where their numbers are
increasing at around 4.5% per year.
- Even if all the gray wolves were exterminated from the 48 contiguous
states, Alaska, Canada and several other nations support viable
populations.
- Inclusion of gray wolves on the Endangered Species List precludes
public harvesting of gray wolves and, thus, costs the government control
program over $200,000 per year to control gray wolves and the MN Department
of Agriculture spends over $67,000 per year compensating farmers
for verified wolf damage to livestock. Money might be saved if
gray wolves could be legally hunted and trapped.
- Endangered species money spent on gray wolves could be used to help
save other, more endangered species.
The debate and controversy about the gray wolf continues to rage among
knowledgeable people on both sides of the issue. What do you think?
 |