Full
Text Scientific Articles
Search
our Bibliography
Search
for full-text articles or abstracts by L. David Mech
 |
 |

Beyond 2000:
Realities of Global Wolf Restoration
23-26 February 2000
Duluth, Minnesota USA
Paolo Ciucci, Luigi Boitani, Department of
Animal and Human Biology, Universite di Roma "La Sapienza", Viale
dell'Universite 32, 00185 Rome, Italy
Although compensation programs for livestock depredations have
been officially approved by Italian Regions since the 1970's, their
costs have never been quantified nor monitored through time at the
local, regional or national scale. However, given the increase in
wolf numbers and range over these past 25 years, wolf-livestock
interactions changed drastically and, correspondingly, compensation
programs have recently been challenged due to their alleged dramatic
increase. As part of a European Union Life-project for wolf conservation,
we quantified compensation costs at the national scale for the years
1991-95, correlated them to the increasing wolf population, and
carried out a comparative analysis of the compensation programs
adopted by each Regional government.
Compensation costs, in the order of US $2,000,000 each year, appear
to be the highest among European countries. However, a large portion
of the wolf population is still illegally killed each year and social
conflicts do not seem to be sedated by compensation. Regional differences
in compensation costs do not reflect differences in wolf numbers
and distribution, nor differences in livestock density. Husbandry
techniques, presence of free-ranging dogs and structure of the compensation
programs all appear to influence compensation costs to some extent.
Even though amount of money spent to compensate depredations by
wolves is still negligible if compared to that paid to farmers to
compensate wild boar damages to agricoltural crops, their recent
increase calls for a revision of both their aims and their structure.
This is especially true in the light of the ongoing increase of
wolves in Italy and, in particular, in marginal and human-dominated
areas. Whereas other models of compensation ought to be explored,
the structure of existing compensation programs (e.g. certification
of alleged damages, percentage and conditions of payment, etc.)
need to be radically revised and integrated into a more complex
conflict-resolution strategy.
|