
J. Henry Fair
Paul Paquet (right), Conservation
Biology Institute, Canada.
Paul C. Paquet, Conservation Biology Institute, PO Box
150, Meacham, SK S0K 2V0, Canada; Carlos Carroll, Klamath Center
for Conservation Research, PO Box 104, Orleans, CA 95556, USA;
Reed F. Noss, Conservation Science, Inc., 7310 Northwest Acorn
Ridge, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
Recent dispersal of a wolf from Idaho into eastern Oregon has
focused attention on the long-term prospects for viable wolf populations
in the Pacific coastal states. We developed regional-scale habitat
models in a GIS in order to evaluate the availability of wolf
habitat in a region that includes southwestern Oregon, northern
California, and the Sierra Nevada. Abundance and accessibility
of prey were evaluated by incorporating information on slope as
well as greenness values derived from satellite imagery. We used
information on roads and human population density to evaluate
potential security from human persecution. The results were compared
with those from a analysis of habitat availability in the Rocky
Mountains. Although human impacts are generally higher in the
Pacific states than in the Rockies, several areas in Oregon and
northern California have levels of prey density and security high
enough to support wolves. These areas lie primarily outside of
current wilderness areas, implying that viability of the wolf
in the Pacific states, as in the northcentral U.S., will depend
on cooperative planning across multiple ownerships. Areas of suitable
habitat in the Pacific states are smaller than those in the Rocky
Mountains, and preservation of landscape connectivity will be
critical for maintaining population viability. To prevent current
land use trends from foreclosing future opportunities for large
carnivore restoration, information on critical landscape linkages
and core areas should be incorporated into regional conservation
plans.