Paolo Ciucci, Luigi Boitani, Department of Animal and
Human Biology, Universite di Roma "La Sapienza", Viale dell'Universite
32, 00185 Rome, Italy
As a preliminary phase of a long-term wolf study, we carried
out a simulated howling survey to census and localize reproductive
packs in the Pollino National Park (PNP), southern Italy. Based
on a systematic sampling procedure the use of simulated howling
surveys has been advocated to census wolf packs over relatively
small areas (e.g. National Parks; cf. Fuller and Sampson 1988).
However, according to topographic and habitat features, and because
the distribution of centers of human activity is not homogeneously
distributed within PNP, we systematically sampled only the southern
portion (800 km2) of the Park; an opportunistic sampling design
was instead considered to be more feasible in the rest of PNP.
The Park (2,200 km2) is the largest in Italy and is featured
by mountainous topography and dense forest cover. From 28 July
through 16 September 1999 we sampled about 60% of the Park using
holws recorded from Italian wolves (courtesy of F. Rivoira). Following
indications by Harrington and Mech (1979) and Fuller and Sampson
(1988), 12 fixed howling routes (range in length: 61-214 km) were
each travelled by car for 3 consecutive nights, and simulated
howls were broadcasted from 5-11 howling stations located along
each route (average distance between stations = 3 km). Each night
6 operators, in teams of 2, covered simultaneously 3 adjacent
routes to avoid double-counting due to wolf movements or shifts
of rendez-vous sites. We elicited howls from adult wolves and/or
pups in 14 different occasions, and localized rendez-vous sites
of 5 different packs. To complete the survey, we travelled 4,400
km and spended 294 hours in the field, with an average of 115±54
Km travelled and 8±1 hours spent each night. Requiring an
average of 8-9 hours in the field to run the survey, each operator
worked for 33 consecutive days for a total of 198 days/6 operators.
On the basis of differences reported in the effort for the systematic
and the opportunistc sampling designs, we conclude with cost-benefit
considerations on the optimal sampling procedure to adopt in a
human-dominated landscape matrix.
References:
Harrington, F.H., L.D. Mech. 1979. J. Wildl. Manage 46:686-693
Fuller, T.K., B.A. Sampson. 1988. J. Wildl. Manage 52:60-63.